tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post8407926023475217324..comments2009-11-15T17:09:58.061-08:00Comments on TheTrueScotsman: Book review - More Than A Theorysean slaterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01768973037531247199noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-31508565513867432902009-11-05T06:03:42.283-08:002009-11-05T06:03:42.283-08:00This might be a little interesting to read. Someon...This might be a little interesting to read. Someone who actually knows what they are talking about!<br /><br />http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/big-bang.htmlsean slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01768973037531247199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-59549998567684953752009-11-05T01:33:01.037-08:002009-11-05T01:33:01.037-08:00BTW, how do you know Universes can't create th...BTW, how do you know Universes can't create themselves? I'm not saying they can but you have to rule that out first. <br /><br />If the rules of this universe did not apply before the universe existed, then why could Universes not create themselves through some unknown process? Why could some previous universe with different rules that always existed not have given rise to this one?sean slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01768973037531247199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-3147334911534528792009-11-05T01:28:58.854-08:002009-11-05T01:28:58.854-08:00Even if there is something outside of everything (...Even if there is something outside of everything (illogical in itself), by definition we have no way of interacting with it because we are subject to the way "everything" works; we are part of "everything". If you could interact in some way with something outside of "everything", then that way of interaction must necessarilly be part of "everything" and therefore it is by definition "natural". <br /><br />Therefore science can only explore natural phenomena. <br /><br />Now excuse me as I have a sore head...sean slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01768973037531247199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-58675011012042239682009-11-04T08:11:29.156-08:002009-11-04T08:11:29.156-08:00... a little too logical.... a little <i>too</i> logical.Anthonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05262963620606499940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-19126912344810579612009-11-04T04:34:01.257-08:002009-11-04T04:34:01.257-08:00by something that wasnt nature.
since it exists...by something that wasnt nature. <br /><br />since it exists, and seems to have had a beginning, and things dont create themselves, dont we have to assume that it was something besides nature?<br /><br />which leads us to a place where nature is not the whole of existance.<br /><br />is this not logical?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07911365785048419348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-31535250194782120582009-11-03T01:27:19.649-08:002009-11-03T01:27:19.649-08:00I don't know.
How was Nature created?I don't know. <br /><br />How was Nature created?sean slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01768973037531247199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6704367815857769259.post-28599461323478573512009-11-02T17:13:15.660-08:002009-11-02T17:13:15.660-08:00did nature create itself?
if yes, explain. ill a...did nature create itself?<br /><br />if yes, explain. ill accept empirical data, i know how fond you are of it.<br /><br />if no, something must be outside of nature. <br /><br />if this could be the state of reality, and you are seeking naturalistic explanations for naturalistic events, how can you hope to find it?<br /><br />im hoping for something better than science is advancing and someday we will figure it out.<br /><br />adamAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07911365785048419348noreply@blogger.com